A brief venture into the world of either social media or the comment section of a news article would reveal our next discussion topic: debate/disputes. In our series to this point, many of the discussed sins are easily understood and the application is clear once the sin has been understood. However, in the case of debates/disputes, a certain amount of judgment (based upon the Scriptures) must be applied to whether the debate or dispute constitutes what is condemned by God. Perhaps this topic is discussed more often by Christians than some of the others in the series, but too often the concept of “debate” is considered to be something that is entirely evil. This topic, like all others, is one that Christians need to carefully examine and seek to understand what the Scriptures teach. Are all debates and/or disagreements condemned in the Bible? What do the Scriptures teach?
In Romans 1:29 (NKJV), the Apostle Paul wrote, “…being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers…” In the KJV, “strife” is translated as “debate” and considering these two translations together provide modern Christians with a more accurate understanding of what Paul was addressing. In this context, debate is used in reference to specific subcategory of debate rather than being addressed in general. How might we discern this from the context? Debate is surrounded in this passage by other sins, such as wickedness, maliciousness, deceit, and the like, which modifies that application of the word “debate” or “strife,” which means that Paul never intended it to be a blanket statement concerning all disagreements.
Not all disagreements and resulting discussions equate to what Paul condemned in Romans 1:29. Simply because two people disagree, even vehemently, does not necessarily mean that any discussion of their two alternative perspectives should be dismissed. Unfortunately, too many Christians have fallen prey to the misconception that the discussion of opposing viewpoints will turn off any non-Christian that witnesses it, but if we look to the Bible it is clear through multiple examples that the Apostles disputed alternative viewpoints (even among those seeking to be faithful to God). However, Paul did instruct Timothy to “avoid foolish and ignorant disputes, knowing that they generate strife” (2 Timothy 2:23). Likewise, Paul instructed Titus to “avoid foolish disputes, genealogies, contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and useless” (Titus 3:9). Was Paul insinuating that all disputes fall under this category and should therefore be avoided? The answer is clear from the context; Paul denotes the specific type of dispute he was condemning by modifying them with the words “foolish” and “ignorant” because such only lead to strife (remember how “debate” is translated as “strife” in the NKJV and similar translations).
Return now to the example of social media and news articles; such examples show that it is easy to see what constitutes a foolish dispute. Consider this rather silly, but pointed example from a few years ago: a popular musical artist posted a photo of his truck on social media. In the comment section, many people began to argue, cuss, swear, and call each other names because of the kind of truck it was and the size of the vehicle. Is there any wisdom in such argumentation? Was there even a valid reason for a disagreement? On a more serious level, however, there are many people claiming to be Christians that arrogantly assert their expertise on all things Biblical and will debate anything, anywhere. Oftentimes, those asserting such claims will present arguments that are self-serving in many ways and will lead to unrighteous behaviors rather than godly ones.
It is clear that discerning between a foolish dispute and a disagreement that may yet yield a positive benefit can be difficult. However, the Scriptures provide Christians with a few guidelines to help with such discernment. In the context of Paul’s words to Titus, he also wrote, “Reject a divisive man after the first and second admonition, knowing that such a person is warped and sinning, being self-condemned” (Titus 3:10-11). How might this help modern Christians determine where a healthy discussion ends and a foolish dispute begins? Can a person misunderstand certain Scriptures, yet continue to work towards a clearer understanding via discussion without being divisive? Perhaps a consideration of Apollos in Acts 18:24-28 would be prudent; Apollos was zealous in his teaching, although he was incorrect. In spite of being so zealous, Apollos was clearly open to discussion and evidence, and when Aquila and Priscilla taught him, he accepted the truth. It is clear that such is not a foolish dispute and that there was a benefit to such a discussion. The example of Apollos is important because his attitude proved his desire to be acceptable to God. Unlike the examples in Scriptures of false teachers, the teachings of Apollos would not lead to ungodliness; in other words, Apollos did not teach a doctrine that abused the grace of God and what he taught was correct at one point in time. Likewise, Christians should consider both the attitudes and the doctrines brought by those who would fall under the divisive category.
A few years ago, an individual stated that he held a position on the topic of modesty that was unheard of among Christians, which is often a good indication of the value of such a position. Based upon the twisting of a few Scriptures (reference 2 Peter 3:16), he claimed that only married women needed to be modest and that unmarried women could dress in whatever manner they deemed necessary so as to attract a mate. At that time, this man was young and unmarried; might such an argument be rather self-serving? Such an argument made it excusable for him to lust after young women and still claim it to be a Scripturally supported stance. Consider the words of Jude who wrote, “For certain men have crept in unnoticed, who long ago were marked out for this condemnation, ungodly men, who turn the grace of our God into lewdness and deny the only Lord God and our Lord Jesus Christ” (Jude 4). Likewise, Jude also wrote “that there would be mockers in the last time who would walk according to their own ungodly lusts. These are sensual persons, who cause divisions, not having the Spirit” (Jude 18-19). When an individual consistently presents arguments that glorify lewd behaviors and carefully twist Scripture to fit their desires, then they are the divisive man discussed in Titus 3. Should Christians continue to discuss and debate with such an individual?
While it is often tempting to continue to debate with such individuals and believe that potential “others” will benefit from it, there is a reason that the Apostle Paul warned against such. Modern Christians should carefully consider the reasons for which Paul wrote to reject such an individual after the first and second admonition; do we consider ourselves to be better equipped than Paul to handle such discourse? If the continuation of such disputes can be excused by saying that “others might benefit from it,” then could the same not have been said during Paul’s time? When such a command is found in the Scriptures, then modern Christians should work towards an understanding of that command and the reasons for which it was issued by God through His inspired writers. As a final admonition, consider the words of Paul found in 1 Corinthians 10:12, “Therefore let him who thinks he stands take heed lest he fall.” These words follow up Paul’s discussion of those in Israel’s past that thought themselves able to be entangled with the world and yet endure it. As Paul stated in that context, “Now all these things happened to them as examples, and they were written down for our admonition…” (1 Corinthians 10:11). Let us take to heart the words of the Apostle Paul!
Tuesday, April 24, 2018
Lesser Discussed Sins Series - 07 - Debates and Disputes
Sunday, March 25, 2018
Lesser Discussed Sins Series - 06 - Pride
In Romans 1:28-32, the Apostle Paul included
“proud” and “boasters” among the list of sins that the rejection of God brings
about. Consider also that Solomon
included this concept in Proverbs 6:16-19, “These six things the Lord hates,
Yes, seven are an abomination to Him: A proud look, a lying tongue, hands that
shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that are swift in
running to evil, a false witness who speaks lies, and one who sows discord
among brethren.” Jesus included it among
a list of rather despicable transgressions when He stated that what “comes out
of a man, that defiles a man. For from
within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries,
fornications, murders, thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lewdness, an
evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness.
All these evil things come from within and defile a man” (Mark
7:20-23). While being prideful might be
overlooked often as being a “lesser” sin (compared, for example, to murder),
Jesus said “All these evil things”, which means that Christians should take
note of it.
While pride is an issue that may frequently be
mentioned in passing, how often do we sit and consider this concept specifically?
However, being prideful and even boastful is an issue that is all too prevalent
in our society today. For men (perhaps
pride is more of an issue with men, generally speaking, but Christian ladies
should be wary of it as well), pride can come about through a number of
different factors; for instance, men might be proud of their academic
achievements, their professional achievements, their material wealth, their fame
(even perceived fame), and the list goes on.
One problem that often develops due to pride is that an outlook on life
is cultivated in which an individual believes themselves to always be correct
and no amount of evidence to the contrary will convince them otherwise. For instance, someone with this outlook might
put forth the argument that since they are “well educated,” everyone should
listen to them on the topic rather than someone who is not so “educated”. Naturally, such an attitude will not be stated
in such obvious terms, but the attitude is present nonetheless; last year, I
read an article in which the author was clearly trying to exert their
intellectual abilities and he disparaged anyone who potentially disagreed with
his stance as being less educated and of lesser intelligence (he even went so
far as to mention his academic degrees and where he obtained them). Such is prideful and inappropriate on many
levels.
In Proverbs 16:18, King Solomon wrote that pride
“goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.” Likewise, in Proverbs 11:2, he wrote that
when “pride comes, then comes shame; but with the humble is wisdom.” Again, he wrote that a “man’s pride will
bring him low, but the humble in spirit will retain honor” (Proverbs 29:23). From just these few passages, it is easy to
ascertain that pride will only bring shame upon the prideful. Pride can often lead to other sins; think
back to Proverbs 6:16-19. How often does
pride lead to these other abominations? For instance, mankind has become so prideful
in their so-called evolved state of being that they determine that unborn
babies are not human and therefore, in their pride, they extinguish those
innocent lives (“…shed innocent blood…”).
Likewise, in James 4:1-10, it is stated that fighting and war comes
about due to pride; this is contrasted with the concept of submitting to God
(which requires humility rather than pride), resisting the devil (again,
requiring submission), and finally it is stated, “Humble yourselves in the sight
of the Lord, and He will lift you up.”
The Bible contains multiple examples of those
that God humbled, which included mighty kings of great empires. One such person was Nebuchadnezzar of
Babylon; in Daniel 5:18-31, Daniel went before Belshazzar, the son of
Nebuchadnezzar, to interpret the writing on the wall. Speaking of Nebuchadnezzar, Daniel stated
that God had given him a great kingdom and had placed him in power, yet “when
his heart was lifted up, and his spirit was hardened in pride, he was deposed
from his kingly throne, and they took his glory from him. Then he was driven from the sons of men, his
heart was made like the beasts, and his dwelling was with the wild donkeys. They fed him with grass like oxen, and his
body was wet with the dew of heaven, till he knew that the Most High God rules
in the kingdom of men, and appoints over it whomever He chooses.” However,
Belshazzar, who knew of these events, had not humbled himself before God
(Daniel 5:22) and God removed the kingdom from him because of this fact (Daniel
5:30-31).
Similarly, we have the accounts of King Manasseh,
his son Amon, and his grandson Josiah.
Manasseh allowed his pride to lead to further wickedness, and like
Nebuchadnezzar, God removed him from power until he “humbled himself greatly
before the God of his fathers” (2 Chronicles 33:1-17). On the other hand, Amon “did not humble
himself before the Lord, as his father Manasseh had humbled himself; but Amon
trespassed more and more” (2 Chronicles 33:22), and so God allowed Amon to be
murdered (2 Chronicles 33:24). Unlike
Manasseh and Amon, Josiah followed the will of God from a very early age; at
age 16, Josiah “began to seek the God of his father David” (2 Chronicles
34:3). Reading through the account of
Josiah, it is easy to determine that he had humbled himself before the Lord God
without having to be taught in the same manner as Nebuchadnezzar or Manasseh (2
Chronicles 34:1-35:27).
These are but brief examples from the Bible that
teach the followers of God about the need for humbleness. It is clear from these passages where the sin
of pride can lead and while pride may not be the first step in a long list of
possible transgressions, pride can lead us down the wrong road. When we consider our own attitude, do we have
a hardened heart like Belshazzar and Amon that will not be humbled? Have we had
a heart like Manasseh that has been humbled by God? Or do we have a heart like
that of Josiah?
Consider those that God has named as being
humble; in Numbers 12:3, the following was stated; “Now the man Moses was very
humble, more than all the men who were on the face of the earth.” If we stop and consider who Moses was, we
realize that he had grown up in the house of Pharaoh, which means that he was
well educated and, prior to his yielding to the will of God, very rich and
powerful. Think also of the submission
of Jesus to the Father, which required humility. Are we greater than Jesus? If Moses was
powerful, Jesus was more so since He had all of the legions of heaven, yet He
chose to do the will of the father.
When the disciples asked Jesus about who the
greatest in the kingdom of heaven would be, “Jesus called a little child to
Him” and then said in answer to those disciples, “Assuredly, I say to you,
unless you are converted and become as little children, you will by no means
enter the kingdom of heaven. Therefore
whoever humbles himself as this little child is the greatest in the kingdom of
heaven” (Matthew 18:1-5). As Christians,
we are to be like Christ, which requires us to deny ourselves and submit to His
will; this requires us to put aside pride and arrogance, and to be humble (not
in word, but in action).
Monday, February 19, 2018
Lesser Discussed Sins Series - 05 - Haters of God
In our last article, we focused on Romans
1:28-32, in which the Apostle Paul included a rather extensive list of sins and
actions that are manifested through the rejection of God. There are a lot of rather distasteful
activities associated with such a rejection; fornication, envy, murder, strife,
inventors of evil things, and the list goes on.
Sadly, a brief look at modern culture proves that the words of Paul are
true and applicable throughout every time period and culture. We see hatred being spewed by those who have
rejected God and many of the actions that Paul describes in Romans 1 are easily
seen simply by watching the news each evening.
The foundation for Paul’s description of society is the rejection of
God, which can often come through one of the problems that is contained in Paul’s
list: “haters of God” (1:30). In our own
culture, we’ve seen this concept at work; society has come to hate God and
therefore reject Him, His commands/word, and His followers. But what does it mean to hate God? How does
one come to hate God?
Recently, there was a video online in which an
individual was offered a Bible for free and was told that she could do with it
as she chose. Her response was to take
the Bible (multiple Bibles, actually) and then say that she would burn them. Instead of burning them, however, she
proceeded to walk outside and start throwing the Bibles against the outside of
the building. Where does such hatred
come from? Does she even understand what she purports to hate? Often, “haters
of God” become such simply because they do not understand Him, nor do they care
to understand Him. Many reject the Bible
and argue against the principles set forth in it without ever actually
considering it; there are many “articles” out there condemning the Bible, but
they arrive at their conclusions not through the careful preponderance of
evidence, but rather through the twisting of the Scriptures into what they are
not (2 Peter 3:16). Through many of the
arguments this particular individual stated, it was clear that she lacked any
actual knowledge concerning what she so vehemently hated. Some things never change; remember that many
were extremely angry with Paul in Ephesus and were rioting, but most of them
had no idea why they were so mad (see Acts 19:21-41).
On this same concept, King Solomon wrote that “it
is not good for a soul to be without knowledge, And he sins who hastens with
his feet. The foolishness of a man
twists his way, And his heart frets against the Lord” (Proverbs 19:2-3). Too many arrive at the conclusion that
society suffers because of God and religion (“without knowledge”) and therefore
support outright wickedness (“hastens with his feet”). In a list of what God hates, Solomon included
a “heart that devises wicked plans, Feet that are swift in running to evil”
(Proverbs 6:18). The principle is that
those who hate God and all that He represents will hasten to do the exact opposite. While the NKJV version of Proverbs 19:3
states the people described “frets” against the Lord, the NASB translates it as
“And his heart rages against the Lord.”
How else could “haters of God” be perceived? The wicked of the world
rage against the righteousness of the Lord and support the wicked deeds
described by the Apostle Paul in Romans 1.
Frequently, coming to hate God is a gradual
digression; many do not start out with hatred for Him, but the world will
happily teach this hatred. In Matthew
6:24, Jesus said that no “one can serve two masters; for either he will hate
the one and love the other, or else he will be loyal to the one and despise the
other. You cannot serve God and
mammon.” In the context, Jesus spoke of
obedience to God and aligning our priorities correctly (such as directing what
we see appropriately, laying up our treasures in heaven, etc.). If our focus is primarily on the things of
this world and pleasures of sin, then we will come to hate God and everything
that He stands for. Where we align
ourselves will direct our perspective towards God; do we seek this worlds
treasures to the detriment of our obedience to God? Then we will come to
despise God and love materialistic things.
In the context of our original passage, Paul wrote that those who reject
God in favor of sin seek to “suppress the truth in unrighteousness” and will
exchange “the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature
rather than the Creator” (Romans 1:18-32).
Why would truth be rejected in favor of an ungodly lie?
Jesus expressed the principle that those who love
darkness (wickedness/lawlessness) will hate the light, the deeds of the light,
and those who practice the light. In
John 3:19-21, Jesus stated that “this is the condemnation, that the light has
come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their
deeds were evil. For everyone practicing
evil hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his deeds should be
exposed. But he who does the truth comes
to the light, that his deeds may be clearly seen, that they have been done in
God.” Interestingly enough, Jesus also
stated that “it [the world] hates Me because I testify of it that its works are
evil” (John 7:7). Not only do many hate
God, but that hatred extends to His followers.
In John 15:18-20, Jesus said that “If the world hates you, you know that
it hated Me before it hated you. If you
were of the world, the world would love its own. Yet because you are not of the world, but I
chose you out of the world, therefore the world hates you. Remember the word that I said to you, ‘A
servant is not greater than his master.’ If they persecuted Me, they will also
persecute you. If they kept My word,
they will keep yours also.”
There is a clear connection between loving this
present world and the hating of God. The
point is clearly made by Jesus who said, “If you love Me, keep My commandments”
(John 14:15). The alternative is clearly
true – if we love the things of this world, and refuse to do His will, then we
become haters of God.
Saturday, January 27, 2018
Lesser Discussed Sins Series - 04 - Whisperers
The concept of
gossip is often depicted as amusing in our society. For instance, in The Andy Griffith Show, the humorous problems caused by gossip were
the underlying plot in numerous episodes.
While this was amusing in a fictional context, it is too often assumed
that gossip is a rather harmless activity to participate in, and therefore it
is one of the lesser of the sins discussed in the Bible. However, gossip is tied intimately with a few
different things that ought to result in our reexamination of our
approach. Frequently, gossip is tied to
or incorporates the concept of “whispering” and “backbiting.” Merriam-Webster defines “backbite” as saying
“mean or spiteful things about a person (such as someone who is not present).” This stands as a concise definition for
gossip and whispering as they are utilized within the Bible as well. Who gossips about a person to their face
(which goes against the very definition of gossip)?
In Romans
1:28-32, the Apostle Paul wrote:
And even as they did not like
to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do
those things which are not fitting; being filled with all unrighteousness,
sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy,
murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers, backbiters,
haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient
to parents, undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful;
who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things
are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who
practice them.
In the context,
Paul was discussing those who would reject God and among the characteristics of
such people he includes “whisperers” and “backbiters”. When we often look at passages such as Romans
1:28-32, we focus on the sins that we see as being particularly transgressive,
such as murder, sexual immorality (fornication in the KJV), and violence. However, examining “whisperers,” “backbiters,”
and the like is really an examination of the mindset of the person committing
those transgressions. If, as Paul
established in Romans 1, those who commit such actions have rejected the Lord,
do we want to travel down that path?
In Psalm 41:7,
King David wrote, “All who hate me whisper together against me; Against me they
devise my hurt.” In this context, David was not speaking about the physical act
of whispering, but rather he spoke of a malicious act of hate and cunning. In the context, David wrote of those who were
once counted among his friends that would then turn against him, such as King
Saul. Consider Proverbs 4:16 where King
Solomon wrote, “For they do not sleep unless they have done evil; And their sleep
is taken away unless they make someone fall.”
In Romans 1, this is the state of mind of that Paul was speaking about;
as he stated, God gave them “over to a debased mind” (Romans 1:28).
This article
does not argue that in order to participate in gossip, backbiting, and
whispering that we must have gone completely over to a “debased mind” as Paul
stated in Romans 1. Participating in
these activities will lead us down the path to a debased mind, however. Even within the body of Christ there are some
who are not happy unless they are causing a problem of some sort; whether it be
for some perceived power (which is in itself a complete lack of understanding
when it comes to what we are to be as Christians) or because of some personal
issue, it seems that some continually try to tear others down. In many contexts in the Bible, the underlying
concept is that of gossip, which frequently separates even the best of
friends. For instance, King Solomon
again wrote in Proverbs 16:27-29, “An ungodly man digs up evil, and it is on
his lips like a burning fire. A perverse
man sows strife, and a whisperer separates the best of friends. A violent man entices his neighbor, and leads
him in a way that is not good.” Again,
there is a steady digression depicted within this passage that points to a
debased mind.
Participating in
gossip is detrimental to our souls; again, Solomon wrote that the “words of a
talebearer are like tasty trifles, and they go down into the inmost body”
(Proverbs 18:8; 26:21-23). Often, gossip
reveals information that is not correct about a person; however, even if some
of the information is correct, the whole picture is not stated. Consider that some talebearer may reveal sin
in the life of another; has that person been approached per the Scriptures?
Have they repented and therefore the sin is no longer in their life? How we
handle gossip is important; for instance, Solomon wrote, “Debate your case with
your neighbor, and do not disclose the secret to another; Lest he who hears it
expose your shame, and your reputation be ruined” (Proverbs 25:9-10). Do we consider how we talk of such matters
even if we have a right to be either offended or if we have been wronged (see
also Matthew 18:15-17)? Consider also
that one who brings those “tasty trifles” (Proverbs 18:8) to you will also gossip
about you; in Proverbs 20:19, Solomon wrote that he “who goes about as a
talebearer reveals secrets; Therefore do not associate with one who flatters
with his lips.”
As noted
previously, we have not necessarily gone completely over to a “debased mind”
when we participate in gossip, backbiting, and whispering, but we tread
dangerously close with our mouth and such a digression becomes a true
possibility if we do not repent and guard against it. In James 3, it is written that the tongue “is
an unruly evil, full of deadly poison” and that out “of the same mouth proceed
blessing and cursing” (James 3:1-12).
Further, James wrote that “For we all stumble in many things. If anyone does not stumble in word, he is a
perfect man, able also to bridle the whole body” (James 3:2). Perhaps this was written with a somewhat
sarcastic tone in mind; further, this was not written as an excuse to sin with
our tongues, but rather it stands as a warning about the dangers of the tongue. This is not an amusing anecdote about gossip that
too often flows from the tongue, but rather counsel that should be taken with
the utmost seriousness. James stated that the “tongue is a fire, a
world of iniquity” and that it is “so set among our members that it defiles the
whole body.” Perhaps this latter phrase
is a play on words in that it refers to the harm that the tongue can do to our
own bodies and the harm that it can do to the body of Christ.
Finally,
consider Provers 10:31 where Solomon wrote that the “mouth of the righteous
brings forth wisdom, but the perverse tongue will be cut out.” What comes from our mouth, blessings or
cursings? Likewise, Solomon wrote that there “is one who speaks like the
piercings of a sword, but the tongue of the wise promotes health” (Proverbs
12:18). Do others benefit from what we
say or do we tear one another down? Again, Solomon wrote that a “wholesome
tongue is a tree of life, but perverseness in it breaks the spirit” (Proverbs
15:4). With our words, do we set the
goal to establish life or to destroy? Where is our mind? Do we have a mind that
is either debased or steadily approaching that state? Solomon also wrote that
an “evildoer gives heed to false lips; a liar listens eagerly to a spiteful
tongue” (Proverbs 17:4). We must guard
against such and ensure that our minds and tongues are where God would have
them to be (reference Philippians 4:8).
Wednesday, August 2, 2017
The Digression of King Saul
There are two
well-known individuals in the Bible that bear the name of “Saul”; one was the
first king of Israel, the second would be renamed Paul and would become an
Apostle. Ironically, King Saul started
his reign as a faithful servant of God and would later digress into wickedness,
while our introduction to Saul (later called Paul) informs us that he was
persecuting the church of God (Acts
7:58; Acts 9). While the change in the
Apostle Paul can be discussed at a later time, we will spend some time looking
at the digression of King Saul; how does a faithful servant fall so far? How
did his faith fail?
In 1 Samuel
15:15, while Saul was speaking to Samuel, he stated that the people had not
destroyed the goods of the Amalekites because they wanted “to sacrifice to the
Lord YOUR God” (emphasis added).
While this is not the first instance in which we see King Saul
digressing, his attitude towards God in this passage marks the true problem and
not just a symptom. The phrase “the Lord
your God” is used frequently throughout the Bible, but the context of the
phrase dictates whether it is a sign of respect or a sign of disobedience; in
this instance, King Saul was rebelling against the commands of God and his
attitude indicates that he no longer believed God to have authority over
him. As noted, this accentuates the real
problem and not the symptom; in earlier chapters, Saul presumed to offer
sacrifices that were meant for only a priest (1 Samuel 13:8-14). Was the offering of the sacrifice the true
problem or was it a symptom of the problem?
The activities
of disobedience (offering the sacrifice or refusing to destroy Amalek) were
truly sins against God, but they stemmed from a heart that no longer
acknowledged the power and authority of God.
Not that in response to Samuel, Saul said that he “felt compelled, and
offered a burnt offering” (1 Samuel 13:12).
By what authority? What lead to this digression away from trusting in
God and submitting to His almighty authority?
Saul Chosen as King
When David was
chosen to be the one who would follow Saul as King, God told Samuel “Do not
look at his appearance or at his physical stature, because I have refused
him. For the Lord does not see as man
sees, for man looks at the outward appearance, but the Lord looks at the heart”
(1 Samuel 16:7). And yet, our
introduction to Saul included that there “was not a more handsome person than
he” and that from “his shoulders upward he was taller than any of the people”
(1 Samuel 9:2). At the anointing of
Saul, there was no mention concerning his heart; at that point, it is clear
that he was a servant of God (he prophesied in 1 Samuel 10:10-13), so obviously
God was with him at that point. However,
Saul had only reigned two years when he chose to make the sacrifice in 1 Samuel
13:1, 8-14.
Saul’s Pride
While it is not
explicitly stated within the Scriptures, it appears that Saul’s pride lead to
his digression; consider the rash vow in 1 Samuel 14:24. In this passage, Saul stated that “Cursed is
the man who eats any food until evening, before I have taken vengeance
on my enemies”; he was clearly focused on his own desires rather than
what God wanted him to do. Later, when
Saul discovered that Jonathan had eaten, he refused to acknowledge the
ridiculous nature of his rash vow and commanded that Jonathan be executed (the
people of Israel refused to a part of this evil; 1 Samuel 14:44-45). Saul’s pride is again emphasized in 1 Samuel
18:6-9; here, the people were praising David for the death of Goliath (1 Samuel
17) and Saul was “very angry, and the saying displeased him” because they
placed him at a lesser value than David.
Further, Saul said, “Now what more can he have but the kingdom?” Additionally,
Saul believed that he had the power to thwart the plans of God; he frequently
tried to kill David so that he would be unable to reign in his or Jonathan’s
place. In 1 Samuel 20:31, Saul stated
that if Jonathan wanted to reign, David would have to be killed; the pride and
arrogance inherent in such a thought is astounding. The true depths to which Saul had sunk was
shown through his willingness to murder the priests who had helped David and
his men in 1 Samuel 22:6-23; the Israelites with Saul would not kill the
priests!
What we learn
from Saul is that pride fails, that we are not as powerful as we think that we
are, and that God is always in control.
In addition to this, we learn that while we respect our leaders and we
submit to them, we are not required to obey ungodly commands (note again Saul’s
command to execute Jonathan and the priests).
There are many
other passages that we could examine in order to understand the digression of
Saul; for instance, he consulted a medium in 1 Samuel 28, which again shows
that he no longer cared about the commands of God. In the end, we see that Saul did not have a
heart dedicated to God; while other men, such as David, committed sin against
God, their hearts drove them to repent and submit to God, but Saul relied only
on himself.
Friday, June 30, 2017
Love the Brethren
In 1 Corinthians 13:1-13, the Apostle Paul provided
a detailed description of love; the essential nature of love is that it is all
encompassing and that it drives our every motive. In the overall context of this passage, Paul
was correcting the attitude of the Christians; if we tie what Paul wrote in
chapter 13 to the rest of the book, we note that the Corinthians had been
envious, they had paraded themselves, they had rejoiced in iniquity, and their
love for one another had failed. Their
care for one another was lacking because of their own selfish ambitions;
desires for their own “rights” (as some today call it) trumped their
willingness to look out for the spiritual wellbeing of one another. This was accentuated by their desire for the “best”
spiritual gifts, their sectarianism concerning by whom they had been taught,
and participating in the activities directed towards idols (this is not a
comprehensive list). A key element in
Paul’s description of love is that Christians need to consider the wellbeing of
one another; this is something that needs to be on our mind with each decision
that we make. Does our decision glorify
God? Does it help others in reaching their goal of heaven? Does it help me
present myself as a servant of God who has denied the things of this world?
How imperative is it that we love one another? In
1 John 3:10, we read that in “this the children of God and the children of the
devil are manifest: Whoever does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor
is he who does not love his brother.”
After referencing the murder of Abel by his brother Cain, John also
wrote that “Whoever hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no
murderer has eternal life abiding in him” (1 John 3:15). In writing this, John was not literally
stating that we are murderers, but that the end result is the same if we hate
rather than love one another.
In Philippians 2:1-4, Paul again wrote on the concept
of loving one another and expressly stated that we should overlook our own
desires in light of those of our brethren.
Nothing is to “be done through selfish ambition or conceit, but in
lowliness of mind let each esteem others better than himself. Let each of you look out not only for his own
interests, but also for the interests of others” (2:3-4). Why are such passages so important to us
today? Many Christians speak about how much love they have for one another, and
indeed that is likely to be their intent; however, what do their actions more
often portray? Remember that the Christians in Corinth believed themselves to
be longsuffering and loving of the brother in error, but Paul corrected their
attitude and their method of discipline in 1 Corinthians 5.
There is an attitude the creeps up now and then
that can be summed up as “If that person doesn’t like what I’m doing, then that
is THEIR problem and not mine”. There
are a plethora of topics through which this attitude is manifested, but perhaps
the most common one (or at least the one we will use as an example) will be on
the topic of modesty. Too often, it is
expressed that how we dress should not
impact the spiritual lives of others and that our “freedom” (although this is
not an established concept from Scripture) should not be impeded by the
perceived weakness of others. Is this an
appropriate attitude for a Christian to parade around with?
Consider that John also wrote that “By this we
know love, because He laid down His life for us” (1 John 3:16). What if Jesus had the attitude that we too
often have towards one another? What if Jesus stated that His life should not
have to be sacrificed for our iniquities? Instead, Jesus led the way for us and
in “this the love of God was manifested toward us, that God has sent His only
begotten Son into the world, that we might live through Him” (1 John 4:9). Therefore, “Beloved, if God so loved us, we
also ought to love one another” (1 John 4:11) and “we also ought to lay down
our lives for the brethren” (1 John 3:16).
If we are unwilling to forego immodest apparel for our brethren, would
we be willing to lay down our lives for the brethren? Are we echoing the love
of God (1 John 3:16, 4:7-11) if we do not care for the spiritual welfare of our
brethren? Or are we allowing things to be “done through selfish ambition”
(Philippians 2:3)?
Part of what leads to such an attitude is that we
do not concentrate on having a godly perspective rather than a worldly one; in
other words, we allow the cares and desires of this world to outweigh what God
would have us desire. Are we keeping up
with the latest fashion? Do we look good in our clothes? Do people of the world
find us attractive? While many argue that it is merely for the sake of comfort
that they wear immodest apparel, are we being honest with ourselves when make
such an argument? For instance, how many times do young ladies wear shorts that
are hardly longer than underwear compensate by wearing a sweatshirt or coat?
How often do young men do the exact same thing? Is this for comfort in the
heat, or is it for something else?
In 1 John 2:15-17, we are told not to “love the
world or the things in the world. If
anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world – the lust of
the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life – is not of the Father
but is of the world. And the world is
passing away, and the lust of it; but he who does the will of God abides
forever.” If our main concern is keeping
up with the latest fashion or being seen as attractive by the world, then we
clearly have placed the love of the world over the love of the Father. If we refuse to consider the spiritual
wellbeing of our brethren in order that we might wear our favorite shirt,
shorts, dress, etc., then “the love of the Father” is not in us. Additionally, John wrote that “He who does
not love does not know God, for God is love” (1 John 4:8). Do we consider the needs of our brethren
ahead of our own desires?
As Paul wrote, “Love suffers long and is kind;
love does not envy; love does not parade itself, is not puffed up; does not
behave rudely, does not seeks its own, is not provoked, thinks no evil; does
not rejoice in iniquity, but rejoices in the truth; bears all things, believes
all things, hopes all things, endures all things. Love never fails” (1 Corinthians
13:4-8).
Wednesday, February 8, 2017
Are We Americanized Christians?
Our government
has granted us the “right” to speak freely about our beliefs and to voice our
opposition even of the government itself; while this is a great blessing in
some ways, it has certainly Americanized many modern Christians. What that means is that we Christians too
often forget our place and our duties within the physical world and assume that
if we disagree with a governmental edict that we have the “right” to
rebel. Unfortunately, this simply is not
a Scripturally sustainable perspective! While the argument could be sustained
that we are to be submissive to the authorities so long as they do not
specifically require us to go against God’s will (Acts 4), we too often
misconstrue that principle. Simply
because the authorities advocate and may even require certain practices that we
do not like does not give us the right to rebel; we must still be submissive.
Too often,
modern American Christians take the Americanized view of the world and believe
that we have the right to be belligerent in our attitudes and in our actions,
that we can rebel against anyone and anything that we deem to be exerting undue
authority over us. This is a very
selfish attitude to have and it certainly is not one that the Scriptures
support. We are to submit to the government (Romans 13, 1 Peter 2:13-17), submit to other Christians (Ephesians 5:15-21), submit to the elders (1 Peter 5), wives to husbands and husbands to Christ (Ephesians 5:22-33), submit to God (James 4:7), and the list goes on. We are commanded to "live peaceably with all men" (Romans 12:17-19). Becoming a Christian does not free us from our responsibilities in this physical life, even if we deem those circumstances to be unjust; conversion does not free the convicted criminal, nor does it free a slave (1 Corinthians 7:17-24, Philemon 1:1-25).
Would we have the attitude of Naaman's slave girl in 2 Kings 5? While we could devise all sorts
of convoluted arguments to claim that this girl wasn’t a slave or that she didn’t
have it as bad as slaves in other time periods, that simply isn’t substantiated
by the text. This girl was a captive and
a slave. By modern standards, even many
Christians would argue that she had the right to rebel since slavery is wrong!
But this girl shows the true nature of a follower of God; rather than dwelling
on her own undesirable plight of being a slave girl in a pagan household, she
selflessly thinks of the well-being of her master…yes, her slave master! Would a
modern Americanized Christian be so selfless?
The other day, a fellow evangelist admonished those who read his post to think about the content rather than immediately trying to think of possible exceptions; I make the same admonishment here! Rather than trying to look for passages that fit with our Americanized view of Christianity, let us think about how God would have us to act.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)